Commercial Lease Types Explained: Find the Best Lease for Your Business
There are many different types of commercial real estate lease types, each of which suits the needs of different businesses. Which is the right one for you?
People who are relatively new to leasing commercial real estate often mistakenly think it is similar to a residential lease on a house or apartment. In fact, commercial leases are quite different and often much more complicated. There are different commercial real estate lease types, each of which suits the needs of different businesses and landlords.
It's vital to understand what kind of lease you are being offered for your commercial property so you can ensure it’s the right lease for your business. Here are the various lease types and how they work.
Gross Lease
A gross lease is one where you pay a flat rental fee that includes everything. This means taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance costs are all included in the lease. You might compare this with the rare residential lease that includes utilities and possibly cable.
Gross leases work well if you are renting office space or retail space in a mall. The lease is calculated to include your share of all of the common operating costs of the space. In other words, your rent will include a prorated share of real estate tax, utilities, building insurance and janitorial costs. This allows landlords to avoid having to meter individual spaces.
Gross leases are typically calculated by analysis or past data, but you can often negotiate specific terms of the lease. For example, the standard lease on an office building might include your share of janitorial services in common areas and other common area maintenance, but it can be to your benefit to negotiate a lease that also includes janitorial services inside the office. This saves money because you are paying for extra time from a company that is already coming in vs. hiring a new company altogether.
Modified Gross Lease
This is a lease where you might have negotiated not to pay for certain things, such as electric utility. This is also very common for commercial spaces with multiple tenants.
Full-Service Lease
This is a lease where you only have to worry about your rent. Everything else is handled by the landlord. This is often a lot more expensive than other lease types, but it can be easier to budget as you don't have to worry about, for example, seasonal increases in utility bills. It is also called a service gross lease.
Choosing a gross lease may seem like the simpler option, but you will pay a bigger rent check every month compared to other lease types. You also need to trust that the landlord will keep up their end of the bargain and ensure that everything is paid for, and maintenance gets done when needed.
Net Lease
A net lease, on the other hand, is one which works from the base assumption that the tenant will be taking on responsibility for some or all of the costs of running and maintaining the building.
This is more common with single-tenant buildings such as warehouses or restaurants, although can be executed in multi-tenant buildings as well. A pure net lease makes you responsible for all the costs related to a property. The rent is thus lower, and although you are responsible for other costs you can typically keep operating costs down by exploring sustainable retrofit projects like a solar panel installation if your facility does not already have.
One advantage beyond the benefit of a lower base rent of a net lease is that you often have more control over the property and thereby maintain a sense of ownership. You can, for example, freely choose your own utility providers and maintenance workers instead of being stuck with the landlord's preferred vendor. While your operating costs may be less predictable compared to a gross lease, net leases tend to be long-term in nature so the uncertainty of operating costs is offset by the predictability in rental fees.
Here are the three major types of net leases:
- Single-Net Lease: In a single-net lease, the tenant pays property tax and other taxes and rent while the landlord covers everything else. Also called an N lease.
- Double-Net Lease: In a double-net lease, the tenant pays taxes, rent and property insurance while the landlord covers everything else. Also called an NN lease.
- Triple-Net Lease: In a triple-net lease, the tenant pays all costs related to property management including taxes, rent, property insurance, maintenance and other costs. Also called an NNN lease. This is the most common type of net lease.
Percentage Lease
A percentage lease is a lease where instead of paying a fixed rent, you pay your landlord a percentage of your sales. This includes a certain amount of base rent, and also a negotiated break-even point, which might be a fixed amount or the base rent divided by the agreed percentage. Percentage leases can sometimes be beneficial to both parties for retail space, especially in a mall or shopping center.
The terms can be net or gross, with the amount of the base rent set according to what the landlord is responsible for in terms of operating costs.
Operating versus Capital Lease
Most commercial real estate leases are operating leases, meaning you do not get ownership of the property after the lease is done. In many cases you will be able to renew and renegotiate the lease.
With a capital lease, the property is treated as a purchase for accounting purposes, and you may gain ownership at the end of the lease. Capital leases have fairly strict requirements and are relatively rare in commercial real estate. They are similar to finance leases, where you automatically gain ownership at the end of the lease term.
Ground Lease
A ground lease is when you own the building, but another party owns the land it is located on. Ground leases tend to be very long, averaging 50 to 99 years (compared to the 10 to 30 year lease term of net leases and the typically even shorter gross leases). While ground leases can offer you full control over the building, with some limitations, you are adding another stakeholder with other interests and opinions. It can also be harder to get out of a ground lease if you need to relocate your business.
So, what is the best type of commercial lease agreement? The answer is that it depends on your business and the kind of space you are leasing. W. P. Carey is a long-term owner of real estate focused on triple-net leases. We primarily own single-tenant industrial properties that tend to be critical to business operations and therefore unlikely to be vacated for many years. This type of lease makes the most sense for these businesses as it gives the tenant full operational control over the property and is most similar to ownership. The added benefit of selling to W. P. Carey is that we are a long-term holder of real estate and do not look to flip our assets. We have a vested interest in maintaining the quality of our portfolio and pride ourselves in serving as a partner to our tenants should you have additional real estate or capital needs past the point of initial sale. That said, with over 50 years of experience providing customized solutions to our sellers, W. P. Carey can work with you on a lease type that is best for you and your business.
Want to learn more? Contact & start the conversation with W. P. Carey today!
Related Topics:
You May Also Like:
Net Lease Retail is at an Inflection Point
As retail investors and operators convene in Las Vegas for ICSC, the conversation around net lease retail feels both familiar and different. Familiar, because the net lease retail market continues to demonstrate resilience and stability. Different, because the drivers shaping today’s retail real estate decisions are evolving—creating new opportunities for operators and investors alike. From rising sale-leaseback activity tied to M&A, to more intentional approaches around store size and format, today’s net lease retail market is being shaped by a combination of strategic growth decisions, changing consumer behavior and a more balanced transactional environment. These are several of the key trends taking center stage ahead of the conference. Sale-leasebacks Follow Strategic M&A Activity One of the most consistent drivers of sale-leaseback volume in retail today is merger and acquisition activity. Whether it involves private equity-backed platforms consolidating regional brands or strategic buyers acquiring complementary concepts, transactions often prompt companies to reassess their balance sheets—and real estate frequently emerges as one of the most efficient sources of capital. In many cases, companies come out of acquisitions with real estate portfolios that were not central to the strategic rationale of the deal. Sale-leasebacks allow operators to unlock that capital, streamline their asset base and redeploy proceeds into higher-return priorities such as new stores, technology investments or debt reduction. What stands out in the current environment is that this activity is not limited to highly leveraged situations. Healthy, growing retailers are increasingly using sale-leasebacks proactively as part of longer-term capital planning, particularly when M&A introduces scale or accelerates geographic expansion. Sale-leasebacks continue to provide a compelling alternative to traditional financing for businesses seeking flexibility and predictability. The Evolution Toward Smaller, More Flexible Footprints Another defining trend across retail is the ongoing evolution of physical store footprints. While large-format locations remain relevant in certain categories, many retailers are gravitating toward smaller, more efficient concepts that align with omnichannel strategies and localized demand. These stores are often designed to serve multiple functions—acting as showrooms, service hubs, fulfillment points or a combination of the three. Flexibility has become increasingly important, both in store design and in location strategy, as retailers respond to shifting consumer behavior. From a net lease perspective, this evolution places greater emphasis on unit-level fundamentals. Smaller footprints can generate compelling cash-on-cash returns, but success depends heavily on the alignment between location, concept and the operating model. The underwriting process for net lease retail investors is therefore increasingly focused on how these formats perform across markets, how scalable they are and how they fit into a retailer’s broader growth strategy. Stabilized Cap Rates Bring Predictability Back to the Market After a period of volatility driven by rapid interest-rate movements, cap rates across the net lease retail space have begun to stabilize. While pricing discipline remains essential, the return of predictability has had a meaningful impact on transaction activity. Clearer valuation benchmarks make it easier for buyers and sellers to transact. Investors can underwrite opportunities with greater confidence, tenants can assess capital alternatives more thoughtfully and deals are less likely to stall amid uncertainty around pricing expectations. That said, credit quality, location fundamentals, lease structure and real estate criticality remain core considerations. However, in a more balanced environment, high-quality assets supported by strong operators are finding liquidity, and capital is moving more efficiently. Looking Ahead As ICSC Las Vegas approaches, there is optimism across the net lease retail landscape. While uncertainty remains part of the broader economic backdrop, the conversations in Las Vegas are expected to reflect an industry that has evolved through recent cycles and continues to find opportunity through change. For net lease retail, the current environment represents less of a reset and more of a recalibration—one that rewards sound fundamentals, flexibility and a long-term investment approach.
An Interview with Gino Sabatini
Gino Sabatini, our Head of Investments, was recently a guest on the Net Lease Observer podcast. In the podcast, Gino discusses: His background in the restaurant business The history of W. P. Carey His view on how the investment market has changed over the years; and His outlook for 2026 and beyond Watch now An interview with Gino Sabatini, W. P. Carey, and Sean Hostert, Net Lease Observer.
MIPIM 2026: Where Capital, Conviction and Opportunity Converge
As the industry gathers once again in Cannes for MIPIM 2026, the European real estate investment landscape appears to be at an important inflection point. After several years defined by volatility, repricing and constrained liquidity, there are growing signs of stabilisation — though the recovery remains uneven and market-specific. Against that backdrop, three questions are likely to dominate conversations at MIPIM this year: Are European transaction volumes expected to improve? How will the sale‑leaseback market evolve amid a significant wall of maturing debt? Which sectors appear best positioned as investors recalibrate their strategies? The Outlook for European Transaction Volumes Pricing expectations between buyers and sellers have adjusted meaningfully over the past 18–24 months, following one of the sharpest repricing cycles the European real estate market has experienced in decades. After a prolonged period of stalled activity, valuations across many markets now show clear signs of stabilisation, supported by greater transparency around interest‑rate policy and financing costs. While long‑term rates remain elevated relative to the pre‑2022 environment, the pace of change has slowed, allowing investors to underwrite returns with greater confidence and begin re‑engaging selectively with the market. This improved clarity around cost of capital is starting to translate into renewed deal momentum in several core European markets. Savills reports that European investment volumes are expected to rise by around 18% in 2026 as pricing firms up, macroeconomic conditions stabilise and institutional capital returns more consistently across the main sectors. That said, recovery is unlikely to be uniform. We continue to see divergence between markets and sectors, with liquidity gravitating toward assets where fundamentals are strongest and underwriting assumptions can be supported over the long term. Sale‑leasebacks and the Growing Need for Capital One of the most prominent themes we expect to discuss at MIPIM 2026 is the growing demand for alternative sources of capital — particularly as a significant amount of corporate and real estate debt comes due this year and next. Across Europe, many owner-occupiers are facing refinancing challenges in an environment where traditional bank lending remains selective and difficult to access. At the same time, businesses are contending with higher operating costs, investment requirements linked to competitiveness, and the need to preserve balance‑sheet flexibility. In this context, sale‑leasebacks are increasingly being viewed as a strategic financing tool. By unlocking capital tied up in real estate, owner-occupiers can redeploy funds toward growth initiatives, operational requirements and debt paydown, while retaining long‑term operational control of their assets. Sectors to Watch: Industrial and Retail When it comes to sector preferences, industrial and retail assets continue to stand out, provided they are underpinned by strong occupier fundamentals. In the industrial space, manufacturing and logistics assets that play a critical role in supply chains remain attractive. Structural trends such as nearshoring, supply‑chain resilience and e‑commerce continue to support demand in many European markets. Assets that are modern, well‑located and tailored to tenant needs are increasingly difficult to replace, reinforcing their long‑term importance. Retail also remains an area of opportunity — particularly for formats that serve non‑discretionary or value‑oriented consumer demand. Grocery‑anchored retail, DIY, and other essential retail categories have demonstrated resilience through economic cycles, supported by consistent foot traffic and defensive spending patterns. A Measured but Constructive Outlook MIPIM 2026 comes at a time when optimism is returning to European real estate markets. While challenges remain, there is growing evidence that capital is being deployed at more significant levels — particularly where opportunities are grounded in fundamentals rather than short-term trends. The conversations in Cannes this year are likely to reflect that balance: pragmatic, selective, but increasingly forward‑looking. For long‑term investors focused on durable cash flows and partnership‑driven transactions, the environment continues to present compelling opportunities.